Thank you for your willingness to give us further feedback on the Immunopaedia e-learning. On this website learning is directed through case studies, graphics, text, glossaries and guest articles. Your comments will assist us in ensuring the website and its contents reflect e-learning principles and that the information presented will facilitate e-learning in an optimal fashion.
Now that you have spent time on the website and are familiar with its content and approach, you can use the list of questions below to give us more information on your experiences with it. Please go through the list of questions below. All you need to do is choose the answer that best fits your opinion for each item and click on it. Each item also contains space for your own personalized comments should you wish to elaborate upon your opinion.
Thanks!
The Immunopaedia Team
PS- The section I below (socio-demographic information) is optional but is very helpful for our records. We would appreciate your willingness to fill out this section |
| |
| Section I: Socio-Demographic Background (OPTIONAL) |
| |
| Review date: |
| |
| |
| Name: |
|
| |
| Current position/job title: |
|
| |
| Current place of employment: |
|
| |
| In what country are you living: |
|
| |
| Was today the first time you are viewing the Immunopaedia website since it was officially (re)launched in June 2007? |
|
| |
| Section II: E-learning feedback |
| While most questions in this section are in a pre-coded format, we have provided space for more in-depth comments. Feedback in the form of your own personal observations is especially useful in helping us improve the content aspects of the website. |
| |
| 1) During this visit, how clearly articulated was the purpose of the website as a whole? That is, how immediately apparent to you were the primary aims of the website? How clearly or easily did you "get" what Immunopaedia is about? Please rate your opinion using the following scale: |
|
| Any more specific comments on this point? |
|
| |
| 2) During this visit, how clearly articulated was the purpose of each specific section of the website? That is, how immediately apparent to you were the primary aims of the sections/tabs on the website? How clearly or easily did you "get" what the specific sections are about? Please rate your opinion using the following scale: |
|
| Any more specific comments on this point? Which specific sections were particularly unclear or clear? |
|
| |
| 3) During this visit, how easily were you able to find the information you were looking for; for instance the case studies, relevant terminology, graphics, and explanation of concepts. Please rate your opinion using the following scale: |
|
| Any more specific comments on this point? |
|
| |
| The next set of questions relates to specific sections on the website. If you did not use a particular section, tick "does not apply to me" for that particular item and move on... |
| |
| 4) How effective a learning tool did you find the case studies section of the website? |
|
| Any more specific comments on this point? What needs to be improved and how? |
|
| |
| 5) How effective a learning tool did you find the immunology themes section of the website? |
|
| Any more specific comments on this point? What needs to be improved and how? |
|
| |
| 6) How effective a learning tool did you find the guest articles section of the website? |
|
| Any more specific comments on this point? What needs to be improved and how? |
|
| |
| 7) How effective a learning tool did you find the glossary section of the website? |
|
| Any more specific comments on this point? What needs to be improved and how? |
|
| |
| 8) How effective a learning tool did you find the gallery section of the website? |
|
| Any more specific comments on this point? What needs to be improved and how? |
|
| |
| 9) How effective a learning tool did you find the highlights section of the website? |
|
| Any more specific comments on this point? What needs to be improved and how? |
|
| |
| 10) How effective a learning tool did you find the breaking news section of the website? |
|
| Any more specific comments on this point? What needs to be improved and how? |
|
| |
| 11) Taking the website as a whole which of the sections that you used were most effective in helping you learn more about immunology? |
|
| Any more specific comments on this point? Why do you feel this way? |
|
| |
| 12) Taking the website as a whole which of the sections that you used were least effective in helping you learn more about immunology? |
|
| Any more specific comments on this point? Why do you feel this way? |
|
| |
| 13) Would you use this website for immunology learning again in the future? That is, would you visit the Immunopaedia website again? |
|
| |
| 14) Would you recommend using this website to colleagues? |
|
| |
| 15) Which sections of the website will you visit again? |
|
| |
|
| |
