Thank you for your willingness to give us further feedback on the Immunopaedia content. Now that you have spent time on the website and are familiar with its content and approach, you can use the list of questions below to give us more information on your experiences with it. Please go through the list of questions below. All you need to do is choose the answer that best fits your opinion for each item and click on it. Each item also contains space for your own personalized comments should you wish to elaborate upon your opinion.
Thanks!
The Immunopaedia Team
PS- The section I below (socio-demographic information) is optional but is very helpful for our records. We would appreciate your willingness to fill out this section |
| |
| Section I: Socio-Demographic Background (OPTIONAL) |
| |
| Review date: |
| |
| |
| Name: |
|
| |
| Current position/job title: |
|
| |
| Current place of employment: |
|
| |
| In what country are you living: |
|
| |
| Was today the first time you are viewing the Immunopaedia website since it was officially (re)launched in June 2007? |
|
| |
| Section II: Website Content Quick Assessment |
| While most questions in this section are in a pre-coded format, we have provided space for more in-depth comments. Feedback in the form of your own personal observations is especially useful in helping us improve the content aspects of the website. |
| |
| 1) During this visit, how clearly articulated was the purpose of the website as a whole? That is, how immediately apparent to you were the primary aims of the website? How clearly or easily did you "get" what Immunopaedia is about? Please rate your opinion using the following scale: |
|
| Any more specific comments on this point? |
|
| |
| 2) During this visit, how clearly articulated was the purpose of each specific section of the website? That is, how immediately apparent to you were the primary aims of the sections/tabs on the website? How clearly or easily did you "get" what the specific sections are about? Please rate your opinion using the following scale: |
|
| Any more specific comments on this point? Which specific sections were particularly unclear or clear? |
|
| |
| 3) During this visit, how easily were you able to find the information you were looking for; for instance the case studies, relevant terminology, graphics, and explanation of concepts. Please rate your opinion using the following scale: |
|
| Any more specific comments on this point? |
|
| |
| 4) Overall, how relevant do you think the information on the Immunopaedia website is to the field of (HIV) immunology?" |
|
| Any more specific comments on this point? Which specific sections were particularly unclear or clear? |
|
| |
| Now we would like to ask a few questions specific to the factual content of particular sections of the website .If you did not visit a specific section, tick "not applicable to me" and move on to the next question |
| |
| Case Study Section Questions |
| |
| 5) Specific to the case studies you used on this visit, to what extent is the information presented in them factually correct? |
|
| Any more specific comments on this point? What needs to be improved and how? |
|
| |
| 6) How adequate is the history section of the case studies in terms of providing information in order for the reader to get a good overall impression of the case? |
|
| Any more specific comments on this point? What needs to be improved and how? |
|
| |
| 7) How adequate are the examination and investigation sections in terms of explaining the procedures and tests carried out in the case study? |
|
| Any more specific comments on this point? What needs to be improved and how? |
|
| |
| 8) How adequate are the discussion sections in terms of explaining the management, pathophysiology and outcome of the case(s)? |
|
| Any more specific comments on this point? What needs to be improved and how? |
|
| |
| 9) How adequate are the evaluation questions and answers in terms of addressing the questions that arise from the case? |
|
| Any more specific comments on this point? What needs to be improved and how? |
|
| |
| 10) Overall, how adequately did the case studies you reviewed explain the problem and concepts being dealt with? |
|
| Any more specific comments on this point? What needs to be improved and how? |
|
| |
| 11) How would you rate the language used (i.e. level of technical difficulty) in the case study descriptions in terms of appropriateness to your learning level? |
|
| Any more specific comments on this point? What needs to be improved and how? |
|
| |
| 12) How would you rate the adequacy of the graphics used in conjunction with the case studies in terms of their technical or factual correctness? |
|
| Any more specific comments on this point? What needs to be improved and how? |
|
| |
| 13) How would you rate the adequacy of the graphics used in conjunction with the case studies in terms of their applicability to the case study? That is, were they appropriate to or adequate for the concepts being addressed in the case study? |
|
| Any more specific comments on this point? What needs to be improved and how? |
|
| |
| 14) Specific to the immunology themes section of the website, to what extent is the information presented in that section factually correct? |
|
| Any more specific comments on this point? What needs to be improved and how? |
|
| |
| 15) How would you rate the language used (i.e. level of technical difficulty) in the immunology themes section in terms of appropriateness to your learning level? |
|
| Any more specific comments on this point? What needs to be improved and how? |
|
| |
| Concluding Questions |
| |
| 16) Overall, to what extent does the information on the website appear contemporary (i.e. cutting edge or in keeping with current developments in the field of immunology? |
|
| Any more specific comments on this point? What needs to be changed and how? |
|
| |
| 17) Would you use this website for immunology learning again in the future? That is, would you visit the Immunopaedia website again? |
|
| |
| 18) Would you recommend using this website to colleagues? |
|
| |
|
| |
